111 Glaucoma - Tips, consejos y experiencias BIBLIOGRAFÍA 1. C.G. De Moraes et al. Detection and measurement of clinically meaningful visual field. Progress in Retinal and Eye Research 56 (2017) 107-147. 2. Nouri-Mahdavi K, Nassiri N, Giangiacomo A, Caprioli J. Detection of visual field progression in glaucoma with standard achromatic perimetry: A review and practical implications. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011; 249:1593–1616. 3. Hartleben C. Pruebas Funcionales y auxiliares en el diagnóstico del glaucoma. Libro Panamericano de Glaucoma. Edición 2013, 79-91 4. Heijl A, Bengtsson B. Standard Automated Perimetry en Glaucoma Diagnosis, Structure and Function, Consensus Series I. Kugler Publications,The Hague,The Netherlands, 2004. 268-272. 5. Jimenez Román J, Chau CE, Ventura N. Evaluación del campo visual: principios generales. Los Glaucomas de la A a la Z, 2018; 54-66. 6. Berke SJ, Musicante J. The Keys to Successful Automated Perimetry. Glaucoma Today. 2012 (3). 7. Aggarwal A, Chhabra K, Kaur P, Singh K, Khosa I, Bansal P. Automated achromatic perimetry. Oman J Ophthalmol. 2018 Jan-Apr; 11(1): 3–10. 8. Hodapp E, Parrish RK, Anderson DR. Clinical Decisions in Glaucoma. St Louis: The CV Mosby Company; 1993. pp. 52–61. 9. Roggen X, Herman K, Van Malderen L, Devos M, Spileers W. Different strategies for Humphrey automated perimetry: FASTPAC, SITA standard and SITA fast in normal subjects and glaucoma patients. Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol. 2001;279:23–33. 10. Budenz DL, Rhee P, Feuer WJ, McSoley J, Johnson CA, Anderson DR. Sensitivity and specificity of the Swedish interactive threshold algorithm for glaucomatous visual field defects. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:1052–8. 11. De Moraes CG, MD, Sun A, Jarukasetphon R, Rajshekhar R, Shi ML, Blumberg DM, Liebmann JM, Ritch R, Hood DC. Association of Macular Visual Field Measurements With Glaucoma Staging Systems. JAMA Ophthalmology. 2018, E1-E7. 12. Chauhan BC, Garway-Heath DF, Goñi FJ, et al. Practical recommendations for measuring rates of visual field change in glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008;92(4):569‐573. 13. Juan Manuel Rodríguez Gomez. Pruebas psicofísicas. Libro Panamericano de glaucoma. ED. 2008, 123-130. 14. Mo Kim JM, Kyung H, Shim SH, Azarbod P, Caprioli J. Location of Initial Visual Field Defects in Glaucoma and Their Modes of Deterioration Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science December 2015, Vol.56, 7956-7962. 15. Sousa MC, Biteli LG, Dorairaj S, Maslin JS, Leite MT, Prata TS. Suitability of the Visual Field Index according to Glaucoma Severity. Journal of Current Glaucoma Practice, 2015;9(3):65-68. 16. Asman P, Heijl A: Glaucoma Hemifield Test. Automated visual field evaluation. Arch Ophthalmol. 1992;110(6):812-9 17. Crabb DP, Russell RA, Malik R, Anand N, Baker H, Boodhna T, Bronze C, Fung SM, Garway-Heath DF, Glen FC, Hernández H, Kirwan JF, Lemer C, McNaught AI, Viswanathan AC. Frequency of visual field testing when monitoring patients newly diagnosed with glaucoma: mixed methods and modelling. Health Services and delivery research. 2014. Vol 2. 18. European Glaucoma Society Terminology and Guidelines for Glaucoma, 4th Edition- Part 1. Supported by the EGS Foundation. Br J Ophthalmol. 2017 Apr; 101(4): 1–72. 19. Wua Z, Medeiros FA. Recent developments in visual field testing for glaucoma. Current Opinion Ophthalmology 2018; 29:141–146. 20. Liu S, Yu M, Weinreb RN, Lai G, Lam DS, Leung CK. Frequency-doubling technology perimetry for detection of the development of visual field defects in glaucoma suspect eyes: a prospective study. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014;132(1):77‐83. 21. Bengtsson B, Heijl A. Diagnostic sensitivity of fast blue-yellow and standard automated perimetry in early glaucoma: a comparison between different test programs. Ophthalmology. 2006;113(7):1092‐1097
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTYwMjk1